State-Funded Leak Detection Solutions for Safer Water Infrastructure

Leverage state-funded leak detection programs with Pipeline Risk—Rezatec’s advanced solution for preventing pipeline failures using geospatial intelligence and machine learning.

Why Leak Detection Prevention Matters to States?

Across the U.S., aging infrastructure, drought, and population growth are fueling billions in state-funded investment for leak detection, risk assessment, and infrastructure modernization. But funding alone doesn’t stop water loss—strategic, data-driven action does.

Rezatec’s advanced Pipeline Risk platform uses machine learning, satellite imagery, and over 100 geospatial datasets to predict over 70% of failures within the riskiest 30% of pipeline segments. This empowers utilities to prioritize high-risk areas, accelerate funding use, and reduce operational costs. With Rezatec, utilities gain faster approvals, measurable impact, and long-term resilience—all while making the most of public infrastructure dollars.

Book A Demo

Available Leak Detection Funding By State

California

Facing persistent drought, California is investing heavily in leak detection and pipe replacement. $950M is allocated for 2025 via DWSRF and CWSRF—with urgency around water loss control in urban and suburban networks.

Florida

With $350M in water funding allocated, Florida is tackling water loss caused by rising sea levels, aging mains, and climate pressures. Utilities with shovel-ready leak detection plans are being prioritized for reimbursement.

Texas

With $202M approved in 2024 and $328M pending for 2025, Texas is prioritizing leak detection through its SB 7 water infrastructure bill and CWSRF program. Rezatec already has a proven pilot with Texas Water Utilities.

New Jersey

New Jersey’s urban infrastructure is among the oldest in the nation. More than $400M in combined federal and state water funds are available, supporting municipalities committed to reducing leakage and improving resilience.

When you take a watermain rehabilitation project to our council for money and say, ‘I have four miles of pipeline that are going to be failing in the next four years,’ they tend to be alarmed. But when you pull up the data and show them, it’s very hard to dispute black and white data on where main break failures will happen.”